toreearly.blogg.se -

Finereader vs readiris mac os x#
Finereader vs readiris pdf#
Finereader vs readiris Pc#
Finereader vs readiris windows 7#

In Acrobat 9 there is a setting called ClearScan. I used these settings on both Windows and Mac.

I set the output style to “Searchable Image (Exact)” because leaving it just as Searchable Image in my experience has caused some weird things to happen with the resulting PDF. These were the settings for the Mac ABBYY, and I believe it is what ScanSnap Manager on Windows uses as well. I set Save Mode to “Text under page image” and Quality to High. There were essentially three configurations: ABBYY FineReader I tried not to do too many fancy settings to keep things as “real-life” as possible. In that test, I re-scanned with “Create Searchable PDF” checked in the ScanSnap Manager settings. If you know how, please leave a message in the comments. Maybe I am blind, but I couldn’t figure out a way to run ABBYY FineReader for ScanSnap on Windows standalone. Here’s some info on the document that I used: In all cases except one, I scanned without OCR so that I could run it standalone later. It probably would have been better to do this with a bunch of different documents to compare, but hey. I scanned a magazine article for this test. Yes, I realize that Adobe Acrobat X is out, but since I am not aware of any scanners that come bundled with it yet, I decided to stick with the versions that ship with the ScanSnap.

Mac: ABBYY FineReader For ScanSnap 4.1 (run standalone) vs.Windows: ABBYY FineReader For ScanSnap 4.1 (called from ScanSnap Manager) vs.

Finereader vs readiris mac os x#

Mac: An old 2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro with 4 GB RAM running Mac OS X Snow Leopard.

Finereader vs readiris windows 7#

Windows: A new cheap Acer laptop with a Core i3 2.40 GHz processor and 4 GB RAM running Windows 7.

I decided to do a quick test comparing the OCR of the two packages using the following criteria: Why? Well, for starters, both of them come included with models the Fujitsu ScanSnap as well as other scanners. There’s just one major niggle with FineReader in terms of usability: like Readiris, it doesn’t automatically save your settings on closing the program, so if you forget to save your options you’ll find yourself resetting them each time you load the program.A very common request that I get here at DocumentSnap is to compare the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capabilities of ABBYY FineReader with Adobe Acrobat. It’s possible to save the files a number of times in different formats, but there’s no facility to save the scanned image for reference. There’s no ‘watch folder’ facility, so you won’t be able to scan documents all day and have them automatically read, but you can easily program an automation to take all the files from a folder, recognise and save them before deleting the original image.

Finereader vs readiris pdf#

Both bold and indented text was perfectly reproduced, and our PDF document, in spite of the problems with the graphs and light-coloured images, showed perfect text recognition.įor SMEs, there’s an Automation Manager, as seen in Omni. If you’re just scanning text, though, you won’t have any complaints with FineReader. FineReader also tried to translate one of the pictures in our greyscale test as text.

Finereader vs readiris Pc#

We also found that what the zone boxes show and what actually gets recognised aren’t necessarily the same thing – the headline on the PC Pro page we scanned was properly recognised, but by the time it got into Word it had been clipped at the bottom. For instance, if you draw two boxes around text that touch, FineReader won’t automatically convert them into one irregular box as Readiris does – you need to change them yourself with a different tool. Of course, you can do your own zoning, and here FineReader holds a slight advantage over OmniPage in terms of responsiveness and ease of use, but it isn’t up to the standard of Readiris.